Pressure loss, overheating, uneven mixing or structural loading: start with the question your team needs to answer. The modelling approach is built around your equipment, operating conditions and available evidence, and the result is a report your team can act on.

Simulation evidence for design, troubleshooting and upgrade decisions.

For manufacturers, EPC contractors and R&D teams: understand your equipment, compare design options and decide what to change.

01

CFD & flow

Locate pressure losses, recirculation and uneven flow distribution in nozzles, ejectors, ducts and process equipment.

Compare geometry and operating conditions before committing to a design.

Discuss your engineering project
02

Heat transfer

Assess temperature fields, heat flux and flow distribution in heat exchangers and thermally loaded components.

Identify the thermal bottleneck and compare design changes.

Discuss your engineering project
03

Mixing & combustion

Study reactant delivery, species distribution and recirculation in burners, jets and mixing vessels.

Understand which feed condition or geometric feature governs the process.

Discuss your engineering project
04

Multiphase flow

Investigate free surfaces, phase interfaces and phase-change processes where a single-fluid model is insufficient.

Select a physical model suited to the question and the available data.

Discuss your engineering project
05

Structural analysis

Assess stresses, deformation, contacts and load paths in components and connections, including thermal loading where relevant.

Identify critical regions and compare structural alternatives.

Discuss your engineering project
06

Model review & custom studies

Review assumptions, boundary conditions, convergence, balances and mesh sensitivity. Build a focused study when the question crosses several physical domains.

Know what the model supports, where uncertainty remains and what needs checking.

Discuss your engineering project

Analysis by type of equipment.

Each page describes the questions a study answers, what is modelled and checked, and where its limits are.

Three ways to engage, sized to the decision.

Each engagement has a fixed scope, an agreed number of cases and defined deliverables, set out in a written quotation before work starts.

Practical courses where simulation becomes engineering judgement

Each course is built around applied results: framing the problem, choosing the physics, building the simulation, verifying it and interpreting the output for real engineering work.

Questions engineering teams ask first

01

What do you need from us to start?

A drawing or CAD model, the working fluids and materials, the operating conditions and the question you need answered. Where an input is missing, the study uses a stated assumption and, if it matters, a sensitivity case.

02

How reliable are the results?

No simulation is exact. Each report states the modelling assumptions and the checks performed, such as convergence, mass and energy balances and mesh assessment. Where you have experimental or operating data, the results are compared with it. Where you do not, the report says what remains uncertain.

03

Can you work under an NDA?

Yes. An NDA can be signed on request before any drawings or data are shared.

04

Which software is used, and do we receive the files?

ANSYS Fluent for CFD and ANSYS Mechanical (Static Structural) for structural analysis. Case and data files are delivered as specified in the quotation, subject to licensing and third-party restrictions.

05

How long does a study take?

It depends on the geometry, the physics and the number of cases. The timeline is confirmed after a technical review of your inputs and stated in the quotation before work starts.

Evidence your team can use.

The agreed scope may include documented assumptions and boundary conditions, verification checks, comparison of design or operating cases, and an engineering report with conclusions and limitations. Experimental or operating data are used for validation when available.

From the question to the decision.

  1. 01

    Define the question

    Agree on the decision, inputs and scope.

  2. 02

    Build the model

    Choose the physics, geometry treatment and operating cases.

  3. 03

    Check the evidence

    Review convergence, balances, mesh sensitivity and available measurements.

  4. 04

    Support the decision

    Explain the mechanisms, compare options and document limitations.

What decision does your equipment need to support?

Share a drawing or CAD model, working fluids and materials, operating conditions, and the question you need to answer. If some inputs are missing, describe what you know.

Discuss your engineering project