CFD & flow
Locate pressure losses, recirculation and uneven flow distribution in nozzles, ejectors, ducts and process equipment.
Compare geometry and operating conditions before committing to a design.
Discuss your engineering projectPressure loss, overheating, uneven mixing or structural loading: start with the question your team needs to answer. The modelling approach is built around your equipment, operating conditions and available evidence, and the result is a report your team can act on.
For manufacturers, EPC contractors and R&D teams: understand your equipment, compare design options and decide what to change.
Locate pressure losses, recirculation and uneven flow distribution in nozzles, ejectors, ducts and process equipment.
Compare geometry and operating conditions before committing to a design.
Discuss your engineering projectAssess temperature fields, heat flux and flow distribution in heat exchangers and thermally loaded components.
Identify the thermal bottleneck and compare design changes.
Discuss your engineering projectStudy reactant delivery, species distribution and recirculation in burners, jets and mixing vessels.
Understand which feed condition or geometric feature governs the process.
Discuss your engineering projectInvestigate free surfaces, phase interfaces and phase-change processes where a single-fluid model is insufficient.
Select a physical model suited to the question and the available data.
Discuss your engineering projectAssess stresses, deformation, contacts and load paths in components and connections, including thermal loading where relevant.
Identify critical regions and compare structural alternatives.
Discuss your engineering projectReview assumptions, boundary conditions, convergence, balances and mesh sensitivity. Build a focused study when the question crosses several physical domains.
Know what the model supports, where uncertainty remains and what needs checking.
Discuss your engineering projectEach page describes the questions a study answers, what is modelled and checked, and where its limits are.
Why is the pressure drop or heat duty different from the design calculation?
from USD 3,000 per project
Heat exchanger CFD analysisWhere do fuel and air mix well, and where do they not?
from USD 7,500 per project
Burner and combustion CFD analysisWhat entrainment ratio and pressure recovery does this geometry deliver at the operating pressures?
from USD 1,500 per project
Ejector and nozzle CFD analysisDoes supply air reach the occupied zone or the equipment that needs cooling?
from USD 3,500 per project
Ventilation and airflow CFD analysisAre the physical models and boundary conditions appropriate for the question?
from USD 450 per review
Independent CFD model reviewEach engagement has a fixed scope, an agreed number of cases and defined deliverables, set out in a written quotation before work starts.
from USD 1,500 per project
One well-defined question about flow or heat transfer in existing or planned equipment.
from USD 3,500 per project
Compare a design or operating change with the baseline before you commit to it.
from USD 7,500 per project
Find a better design within limits you define, with the options ranked.
from USD 450 per review
A check of your own or a supplier’s simulation: assumptions, boundary conditions, mesh, convergence and balances, with written findings.
from USD 120 per hour
Technical discussion, interpretation of results and design recommendations. Advanced CFD troubleshooting is quoted from USD 150 per hour.
Prices are indicative starting rates in USD. The quotation depends on geometry complexity, physics, computational requirements, number of operating cases, verification needs and agreed deliverables. Combustion, multiphase and transient studies often need a customised proposal.
Every engagement includes post-delivery support for questions about the results and delivered files; the period is stated in the quotation. NDA available on request.
Each course is built around applied results: framing the problem, choosing the physics, building the simulation, verifying it and interpreting the output for real engineering work.
A drawing or CAD model, the working fluids and materials, the operating conditions and the question you need answered. Where an input is missing, the study uses a stated assumption and, if it matters, a sensitivity case.
No simulation is exact. Each report states the modelling assumptions and the checks performed, such as convergence, mass and energy balances and mesh assessment. Where you have experimental or operating data, the results are compared with it. Where you do not, the report says what remains uncertain.
Yes. An NDA can be signed on request before any drawings or data are shared.
ANSYS Fluent for CFD and ANSYS Mechanical (Static Structural) for structural analysis. Case and data files are delivered as specified in the quotation, subject to licensing and third-party restrictions.
It depends on the geometry, the physics and the number of cases. The timeline is confirmed after a technical review of your inputs and stated in the quotation before work starts.
The agreed scope may include documented assumptions and boundary conditions, verification checks, comparison of design or operating cases, and an engineering report with conclusions and limitations. Experimental or operating data are used for validation when available.
Agree on the decision, inputs and scope.
Choose the physics, geometry treatment and operating cases.
Review convergence, balances, mesh sensitivity and available measurements.
Explain the mechanisms, compare options and document limitations.
Share a drawing or CAD model, working fluids and materials, operating conditions, and the question you need to answer. If some inputs are missing, describe what you know.
Discuss your engineering project